<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The &#8220;Woah You&#8217;re Totally Right&#8221; Entry of the Day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ninme.com/archives/2005/04/the_woah_youre.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ninme.com/archives/2005/04/the_woah_youre.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 02:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: -keith in mtn. view</title>
		<link>http://www.ninme.com/archives/2005/04/the_woah_youre.html#comment-461</link>
		<dc:creator>-keith in mtn. view</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 17:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://d829161.u25.nozonenet.com/?p=1591#comment-461</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Bruce, not just "near," we probably hear your train in the morning (?)- I'm sure my wife does anyhow! ;-)
Ninme when you say, "takes-one-to-know-one" and add the &lt;i&gt;affinity&lt;/i&gt; of identification pathology: "that (which) you hate most in others (is) what you’re most guilty of yourself."  that really brings it home.
The whole "liberal crackpot-solution" thing keeps me coming back to the &lt;a href="http://www.phule.net/mirrors/unskilled-and-unaware.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Cornell study of incompetents&lt;/a&gt;; people who can't self-assess and delusionally, place themselves in the upper percentile when really, performancewise they're in the lowest 25th.  Heh, "self-esteem" is actually a reflection of self-protective ego-coating.
It explains to me how they can believe that proven failures can somehow magically morph into successes, simply because they &lt;em&gt;think&lt;/em&gt; that they are "Good" ideas.  And it explains to me how they can conceive of themselves as being &lt;i&gt;morally suprior&lt;/i&gt; (and also, especially, that others are less-so), and that they are "Great Humanitarians" simply because they hold a certain principle in mind.
Mind over matter, eh?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce, not just &#8220;near,&#8221; we probably hear your train in the morning (?)- I&#8217;m sure my wife does anyhow! ;-)
Ninme when you say, &#8220;takes-one-to-know-one&#8221; and add the <i>affinity</i> of identification pathology: &#8220;that (which) you hate most in others (is) what you’re most guilty of yourself.&#8221;  that really brings it home.
The whole &#8220;liberal crackpot-solution&#8221; thing keeps me coming back to the <a href="http://www.phule.net/mirrors/unskilled-and-unaware.html" rel="nofollow">Cornell study of incompetents</a>; people who can&#8217;t self-assess and delusionally, place themselves in the upper percentile when really, performancewise they&#8217;re in the lowest 25th.  Heh, &#8220;self-esteem&#8221; is actually a reflection of self-protective ego-coating.
It explains to me how they can believe that proven failures can somehow magically morph into successes, simply because they <em>think</em> that they are &#8220;Good&#8221; ideas.  And it explains to me how they can conceive of themselves as being <i>morally suprior</i> (and also, especially, that others are less-so), and that they are &#8220;Great Humanitarians&#8221; simply because they hold a certain principle in mind.
Mind over matter, eh?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Chang</title>
		<link>http://www.ninme.com/archives/2005/04/the_woah_youre.html#comment-460</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Chang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 00:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://d829161.u25.nozonenet.com/?p=1591#comment-460</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You're from near MV?  That's where I get on the Caltrain!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re from near MV?  That&#8217;s where I get on the Caltrain!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
