Can’t Cuidich ‘n Righ

Black Watch veterans bid farewell to their regiment
I feel that way too.
Telegraph - Highland lament: Scotland’s oldest regiments march into history
It was out with the old and in with the new yesterday as six Scottish infantry regiments were consigned to military history.
While Black Watch veterans, wearing the red hackle, lamented the loss of their 267-year-old regiment, serving soldiers wore the cap and badge of the new Royal Regiment of Scotland for the first time.
Ceremonies were held in Perth, Edinburgh, Belfast, Cyprus and Basra to mark the disappearance of the Black Watch, the King’s Own Scottish Borderers, the Royal Scots, the Royal Highland Fusiliers, the Highlanders and the Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders.
The new regimental badge features the saltire, a lion rampant and a crown with the motto Nemo Me Impune Lacessit (No one assail me with impunity). Ministers say the merger will create a more mobile Army for the 21st century.
I can’t believe they did that. I just can’t believe it. And if you need a good cry, get a load of the headlines linked at the bottom, including this one (rearranged to be in order):
• 3 October 2005: Scotland’s old soldiers unite to fight merger plans
• 26 November 2005: Dismay as regiments lose their historic badges
• 29 March 2006: Highland lament: Scotland’s oldest regiments march into history
Update (3.31):
Politicians knife Scottish regiments
Sir - It was a sad day for the United Kingdom when six Scottish regiments disappeared for ever for dubious governmental reasons of “costs and efficiency” (News, March 29).
These Highland and Lowland regiments were the pride of Scotland and the envy of the world. Amongst their number was the Royal Scots, the 1st of Foot, the oldest British regiment and the longest serving regiment in the world. From the 17th century to today, the “Jocks” have served loyally and courageously, defending the Crown, Parliament and all the people of this island. From Blenheim to Basra, they have inspired awe, admiration, and in Scotland, fierce affection, as they largely replaced in the regions from where they were recruited, the bonds, loyalties and ties previously reserved for the ancient Highland clans and Lowland families.
The Scottish regiments have never been defeated and have never been found wanting, but have been destroyed with a knife in the back, from a government so mediocre, tarnished and shabby, that it does not care or even understand the shame (and danger) of its directive. New Labour, which has a constant juvenile need to be seen as trendy and modern and answerable only to focus groups and PR consultancies, has eradicated in one stroke the proud regimental structure in Scotland.
Gordon Brown had the astonishing gall recently to pretend to champion the British traditions that give us our pride and identity. His contribution to this debate, so typically crass, was to suggest we adopt an American tradition of sticking flags in our front gardens.
Peter Ferguson, Hertford
What he said.
March 31st, 2006 at 3:48 am
Sad, I don’t see why the names couldn’t have been attached to the new formations. Maybe the Canadians can revive their section. It’s was the Black Watch that just about won the Revolutionary War for the wrong side by their shattering of Washingtons line on Long Island. Very lucky to have saved any of the army. The regiment refused battle honors for that action since it was fought “against keith and kin”.
March 31st, 2006 at 6:11 am
There are individual battalions within the regiment supposed to carry it on, but it ain’t the same. The thread of history’s broken. It’s all part of Labour’s hatred of rival institutions, an assault on its ethos.
Amalgamation does make sense in Yorkshire, which has seen its three merge into one, but those regiments don’t hold the same place in the history, culture and affections of people as do the Scottish regiments. A dark day.
Hadn’t known the Black Watch had made themselves so useful on Long Island. Smart work. Their band played for President Kennedy on the White House lawn in November 1963 and then, a few days later, at his funeral.
March 31st, 2006 at 9:23 am
On a happier note a part of English history is returned…. it seemeth that Geoffrey Chaucer hath a blog at… http://houseoffame.blogspot.com/
March 31st, 2006 at 9:28 am
Oh boy that’s brilliant! I mean I can’t think why the guy should go to such trouble, but, hey!
Chaucer was called the flower of all the Makars by my favourite Scottish poet (who isn’t Burns).
March 31st, 2006 at 9:50 am
I looked over at his tee-shirt site and it’s evident that this guy is a brilliant marketeer as well as olde English scholar.
March 31st, 2006 at 2:29 pm
abbreviaciouns
Oh newfanglenesse! Y have learned the privitees of the manye abbreviaciouns ywritten on the internette. OMG: “oh mine ++DOMINUS++”. ROFL: “rollinge on the floore laughinge”. IRL: “in reale lyfe.” WTF: “whatte the swyve?”
Beinge somethinge of an innovator myselfe, Y presente to yow, churles and gentils alle, the followynge abbreviaciouns. May they serven yow welle in your internette communicacioun:
GP: gentil person
WC: woole customes
XC: Exchequer
BATJG: biggere arsehole thanne john gowere
BSL!: by seinte loy!
OTPBRB: Offe to parliamente, be ryghte back
SNAPFU - BYXCA: supposedely nyce annuitie paymente fuckede uppe by the XC againe
KRBMA: Kynge Richarde II buggynge me againe
AOMSHJDOTBD: anothere of myne servauntes hath just dyede of the blacke death
EISBYMIWATCHDNSTHD: eftsoon I shall be ycleped mad if worke atte the customes house doth not settle the helle downe
Hilarious!
April 1st, 2006 at 2:15 am
I’ll wager this fella can speak Middle English like a second language. Otherwise the time involved would be horrendous.
April 2nd, 2006 at 6:25 am
BSL, Oh heavnes thisse sitte is killinge me!
April 3rd, 2006 at 9:09 am
Actuallie, speakynge Chaucer-wise is somdeel easier aftere whilom tyme, butte thisse chappe seemth to have gotten alles ye inne-jokkes and and recheche bittes of funne. Chaucer and Gowere arre supposed to have beene trewely friends, for one thinge.
April 3rd, 2006 at 9:54 am
I figure you could fake it fairly easily if you learned the spellings, but then for instance I don’t think “gotten” and “supposed” really fit there, so an amateur would definitely have some wrong words slip in.
April 3rd, 2006 at 9:58 am
You’re right. Ye olde tinne-eare stryketh againe.
April 3rd, 2006 at 10:51 am
I always laugh to think of the evolution of English, when it went from people runneth away to runs away, and the intermediary runth away. All these courtly nobles striking a dashing pose and lithping at each other.