My Battle Cry, My Motto, My Cri de Coeur:
The Times - Period homes for everyone! by Libby Purves
Shock horror - Venice is restoring old buildings for the low-paid to live in. It should happen here
The Venice in Peril Fund, more usually associated with saving monuments and co-ordinating research on the tidal barrage, decided to [turn] the [San Giobbe] house into four flats. These — wait for it — will not be sold to tourists but offered to Venetian families on the waiting list for social housing. The ground-floor flat has been created and made flood-proof for a disabled user.
Despite the economically humble nature of its tenants, the house has been restored far better than most. … The aim was to demonstrate that sensitive restoration can be done at a low cost; but the extra and glorious twist is that this was done not for rich dilettantes or romantic foreign tourists, but for ordinary working Venetians. The municipality, encouraged and helped by Venice in Peril, has taken a step towards not only the physical, but also the human, regeneration of the city.
Zip northward now, to the “Tardis Terraces” in Preston and Manchester Moss Side, where instead of taking the John Prescott dream to heart and knocking down traditional terraced houses wholesale, a company called Adactus used innovative and clever design to improve the insides of houses usually dismissed as poky and unsuitable for modern life. It used loft conversions, double-height living spaces and modern facilities; it plans to knock some twos and threes together into larger family homes. Each house converted costs less than demolition and building afresh. The smaller ones will sell cheaply or be available for “shared ownership”. Thus with modern amenities, ordinary working families can live in something which is part of the national heritage and identity. Which is appropriate, because they too are part of that identity.
It seems a far cry from the devoted architectural historians of San Giobbe to the groovy Tardis Terraces of Preston, but the two should take heart from one another. Time cannot stand still, not anywhere, yet much of a nation’s history and personality lies in its humbler buildings. It is unwise to trash things wholesale (unless, like Kim Il Sung of North Korea or Ceausescu of Romania, you actively want to destroy national character for murky political reasons).
What exactly is she saying about Mr Prescott, there? (cackle)
No point saving the church and the pub if they stand in a futurist wilderness.
Yet John Prescott’s Pathfinder programmes, with more than £1 billion of government funding, is panting to demolish perfectly viable houses. One group of academics claims that 400,000 Victorian houses are at risk; we know that 10,000 are going. The Treasury continues to make Britain uglier (and fill the landfill sites with rubble) by stubbornly charging VAT on house refurbishment while giving new-build a zero VAT rating: yet some new-build will last barely 20 years.
Period homes for everyone! (…Even Americans!)
April 11th, 2006 at 5:02 pm
I live in an American period home. Sadly the period is IkeAmerica.
BTW I haben an old neighbor who has an honest to gawd fallout shelter…. very, very strange.
April 12th, 2006 at 2:22 am
Fallout shelter? Not look’n too stupid now. Keep stocked with canned goods and bottled water.
April 12th, 2006 at 3:52 am
He grows mushrooms in it.
April 12th, 2006 at 3:53 am
The big building companies favoured by Prescott will one way or another be substantial political donors. Terraced urban housing works well here in Edinburgh, alongside the apartment blocks. No-one would be allowed to knock it down because it’s what the middle classes live in. Terraced urban housing as lived in by working class people is of course fair game.
April 12th, 2006 at 9:19 am
I think I did some community service (for high school) at an old folk’s home that I swear had a bunch of old signs pointing to a shelter in one corner of the building.
My uncle had a plan to build a fallout shelter at my grandparents’ house. He has all the books on how to construct them. Amongst other things.
But yes, Ike bad. Except for the expensive Ike houses. Those are nice.
Would it be constitutional or whatever to give Prince Charles Prescott’s job? Or I guess he isn’t an MP, so uh, Permanent Undersecretary, or something? He seems to be the only person with his head screwed on right about this over there. Him and Libby.
April 12th, 2006 at 9:40 am
He’s a member of the House of Lords and therefore as much a member of Parliament as is Prescott. What an excellent idea.
April 12th, 2006 at 1:00 pm
Is he really? I thought he wasn’t allowed to have an opinion on things (not for any constitutional reason but just because the newspapers are agin’ it). Hmm, shall we draft a petition to draft him?
April 13th, 2006 at 2:37 am
I don’t see why we shouldn’t. He clearly has a better feel for how people want to live than does Prescott who is after all only a “here today and gone tomorrow” politician.
April 13th, 2006 at 9:21 am
And his very nature is deeply steeped in history and a sense of time and purpose! Just the sort of person you want putting up your house!