Bad Dogs
This is so unfair and so cruel, I think I might burst into tears.
Telegraph - Foxes can safely sleep: babies can’t. By Andrew O’Hagan
Historians some day might be astonished to discover the number of man-hours that went into protecting countryside vermin from dogs and humans, while an average of 3,000 people are injured every year by dangerous mutts with irresponsible owners.
After the killing of Cadey-Lee Deacon the other day – snatched from her bed by two Rottweilers and mauled to death on the roof of a pub – it might be intelligent to look again at the 1991 Dangerous Dogs Act, which was always too perfunctory in its details.
That Act came into being because of the wildly increased number of maulings by English pit bull terriers, and it became an offence to be the owner of a dog that is out of control in a public place. But the breadth of that stricture misses the point: many of these dogs are bred (and adored) on account of their viciousness, and a great number of the people who have them as pets see them as being a symbol of both personal security and incipient rage.
I’m against those dogs. Just as I don’t understand why anyone in civilian life would have use for an automatic assault weapon, I don’t see why anyone should be encouraged to squire a dangerous dog around the streets.
In America, the right to own such a weapon is taken to be a matter of civil liberties, and some will say the same of those dogs: you can’t stop people having them or training them, and can only insist that some of them wear muzzles.
Vicious dogs — pit bulls, Dobermans, Canary Island dogs — they’re vicious as a result of animal abuse. He said himself the dogs “are bred (and adored) on account of their viciousness, and a great number of the people who have them as pets see them as being a symbol of both personal security and incipient rage,” and to get them to fill that symbolic role they will purposefully beat the dog, starve it, keep it in cages, feed it gunpowder to make it “mean”, all so when they’re out on the street their poor animal look sufficiently terrifying in front of their a-hole friends. But by all means, rather than punishing the owners for animal abuse, let’s ban the animal because they’re “naturally vicious” and let the bastards doing this to them trade in illegal dogs just like they’re trading in illegal guns and knives and drugs and everything else that’s been banned in that stupid country in the past forty years because god forbid we should have to actually put anyone in jail.
September 27th, 2006 at 7:37 pm
Exactly right. The Bull Terrier, a close relation to the Pit-Bull Terrier, is the friendliest dog going - highly recommended for families with children for that reason (they are also indestructable, so it doesn’t matter if the children in question are small boys).
I know I shouldn’t say this on a cat-lover’s blog, but of all the species on the Earth, the dog is the only one which has allied itself with humanity.
September 27th, 2006 at 10:13 pm
Yes, our relationship with cats is purely one of convenience. Primarily theirs.
But I think the reason we get along so well with cats is because we’re quite similar to them, evolutionarily speaking.
For that you should really listen to this (http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/history/inourtime/inourtime_20050623.shtml). It was fascinating. On more ways than one. The way they looked at pregnancy in placental mammals (and us) as a repression of the immune system was really interesting. Plus it was really funny. I love scientist jokes.
But back to dogs, it’s just so unfair and all it does is perpetuate the attitude that some dogs are just naturally bad, which makes people scream in terror when a perfectly lovely little butterball like our Corey dog runs up to them when she’s gotten into the front yard in a morning. It’s just so unfair.
September 29th, 2006 at 3:53 am
the dog is the only one which has allied itself with humanity
It’s the affinity for long, long walks. From Africa to Australia to Patagonia, that’s a long way, we got things settled. I figure the Cats came along in someones knapsack.
September 29th, 2006 at 4:09 am
Long walks, exactly. The pickup trucks just sealed the deal.
September 29th, 2006 at 10:38 am
Nah, not napsacks. They don’t need us, but we need them.
In other words, they came over on a little pillow with fish caught every day especially for them, with someone petting and cooing over them for the whole voyage, and when they got there, just just walked off to kill some flightless bird.
September 29th, 2006 at 4:22 pm
Still kitter cats are the only domesticated, solitary, territorial animal every domesticated.
/end Brood, Gums & Steal
September 29th, 2006 at 8:49 pm
I was going to say rats (talking of killing flightless birds), but Peter thinks they’re fairly social. Ooh look I Wikied it and lookit what got a mention!:
Because of this, the entire province of Alberta, Canada has upheld and maintained a rat-free status since the early 1950s
yaaay.
Hey did you know that rats can actually last longer without water than camels? God I love Wiki.
It doesn’t say how social they are.