Proving that Only Redeployment of American Troops Can End a Civil War
Terrorism is a nasty thing, people, and it’s important that the US recognizes it’s role in causing it.
FOXnews - Officials: 3 Homicide Car Bombs Kill 6 in Somalia
MOGADISHU, Somalia — Three
homicidecar bombs exploded outside Somalia’s government base of Baidoa, killing at least six people, including the drivers, and wounding four civilians, officials said Thursday. One of the bombers was a veiled woman.The bombing took place at a government checkpoint, exploding as police tried to check them, Deputy Defense Minister Salad Ali Jelle told The Associated Press.
“The three drivers were killed on the spot and three others who were with them,” the minister said by telephone. “We have captured three who were with them who have tried to flee. The dead include non-Somalis, they are Al Qaeda supporters.”
(Quick break: for those of you who aren’t already familiar with this little habit of theirs, Foxnews has this thing about calling suicide bombers homicide bombers because they’re intended to kill people and “suicide” puts too much unfair emphasis on the victim. It drives me nuts.)
On a related note, James Taranto has been publishing letters from members of the armed services responding to Charlie Rangel’s latest Love Letter From the Democrats to them (I wish they wouldn’t do that, it’s so …something. If I wrote a post saying that I think all blondes are idiots, all the blondes among you wouldn’t write me emails saying, “Well actually I have two BSs and a Masters”. You’d email to tell me I’m a jerk. Charlie Rangel should be told to go to the nearest Army/Navy/Airforce academy and and tell them to their faces what he thinks of them, rather than from a studio in downtown DC where all they can do is write angry letters to a sympathetic journalist in New York.), including the following:
Patrick Shearin weighs in on the importance of strong political leadership:
I’m brought to tears reading the testimonials from the best and brightest that are currently serving in harm’s way. As I read, I was viewing the film “Rocky,” an all-time American classic, and for some reason the power and optimism of American youth overwhelmed me. I got my degree and I served and I chose combat arms (mechanized infantry–HUAH), but I did so in what was to be known as the Clinton years. Now I will grant you that I am a marked partisan, nonetheless, the impact of that C-in-C cannot be underestimated.
Myself, I conducted a recon-in-force and once I saw that the Clinton administration was going to leave matters like the Mog (the battle of Mogadishu) alone, I figured I was done. They were far more concerned about gay rights, Waco and Elian Gonzalez than us grunts. Just see what the Mog generals asked for and what they got! Les Aspin, RIP, shot them down, right before they were shot down. Not that the U.S. press cared. Funny how U.S. servicemen and our enemies pay the most attention to our suffering. I don’t remember the barometer of Clinton’s non-policies’ effects on re-enlistment when I bailed! That was when nothing mattered (pre 9/11), but a lack of support and understanding from the home crowd.
I think that is a fundamental disconnect between those who serve and those who never will–what is the mission and what is the home mood. Most of us serve regardless, it is a matter of how long. The mission affects that–if it is worthy, so many will stick to it, some may not. But it is a strong beacon when there is a leader that will lead the home, when there is a president who will stand up and stand strong against what needs to be done. A serviceman is used to being ignored and misunderstood, but when his president stays with him, well, he never, ever forgets that.
I hope that President Bush knows that.
So there you go, folks. Proving once again that getting out of Iraq is the only way to solve this horrible mess.
December 1st, 2006 at 3:36 pm
Obviously Rangel is an idiot, but the point is not that troops are in fact well educated. I am sure there must be some uneducated servicemen, too, but they also volunteered to risk their lives and endure hardship. Who is Rangel to patronise them and belittle their decision to serve? In a time of war? I know he was in the Korean war and all that. I don´t care. You don´t treat men like that. Even Nelson´s press-ganged sailors would not have stood for it.
In any case, it is well known that Rangel would prefer not to have an army at all.
December 3rd, 2006 at 2:08 am
Well said wf.
December 3rd, 2006 at 3:26 am
Warming to the theme. I have a vision. We go back in time…back to 1798…
“Hello sailors, I am the Tenth Sea Lord Charles the Earl of Rangel and I´d like to congratulate you on your hardwon escape in the battle of the Nile. But of course none of you wanted to be there. And you should not have been, poor sods. So many dead - on both sides. In any case, we will end this now. I say, dissolve the fleet, relieve Nelson and negotiate with France. France is a great and ancient civilization and Boney´s a raisonnable guy. Do you know the French invented the enlightenment? Of course you wouldn´t. And if things take a nasty turn, well, that´s what we have the channel for. Those of you who have lost a limb in the service: let that be a lesson to future generations.”
December 3rd, 2006 at 9:16 am
I started to chuckle but then the crushing depression set in.