<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Women on Having It All</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ninme.com/archives/2008/09/women_on_having_it_all.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ninme.com/archives/2008/09/women_on_having_it_all.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 11:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: DirtCrashr</title>
		<link>http://www.ninme.com/archives/2008/09/women_on_having_it_all.html#comment-44695</link>
		<dc:creator>DirtCrashr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 21:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ninme.com/?p=9070#comment-44695</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It's a strangely twisted commentary, reflecting a twisted-up rationale I guess, because there's absolutely nothing feminine suggested, directed or instructed in the Feminist Doctrine -- so the logic she uses = Fail.  And Hillary Clinton as "safe lines and patronising empathy" - she must have been watching a different movie on the Airplane, or had too many in-flight martinis.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a strangely twisted commentary, reflecting a twisted-up rationale I guess, because there&#8217;s absolutely nothing feminine suggested, directed or instructed in the Feminist Doctrine &#8212; so the logic she uses = Fail.  And Hillary Clinton as &#8220;safe lines and patronising empathy&#8221; - she must have been watching a different movie on the Airplane, or had too many in-flight martinis.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
